Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal employees have till February 6 to choose whether to voluntarily leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, employment OPM, notified workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to depart and be paid till the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is a work legal representative who represents federal staff members as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s delayed program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact don’t consider it so much a deal. I believe it’s a demand employment to resign with a vague pledge that, potentially, you might be kept in administrative leave status for approximately eight months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been using the term buyout to describe what this is because there seems to be the offer of administrative leave for up to 8 months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never describe it as a buyout. I think that’s a very misleading term to utilize in this scenario. When you believe of a buyout, there’s generally some sort of written agreement or a concrete deal to supply an advantage in exchange for employment waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: employment If clients ask you for your guidance, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is exercise extreme care. There are no assurances contained in this e-mail. The only thing I can tell you for certain is that if you alter your mind, the agency’s probably not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially providing up control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some category of employee who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an attractive offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most cautious due to the fact that leaving earlier than intended can have serious effects, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told reporters that this is a good offer for people who don’t wish to return to the office. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a suggestion to federal workers that they need to return in – to work. And if they don’t, then they have the option to resign, and this administration is very kindly offering to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just – in a manner, it breaks my heart that federal staff members are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s developed to get folks who work truly hard to resign. I think it’s attempting to pull the wool over a lot of people’s eyes since there are no assurances. And these are individuals who enjoy their task. They love the objective of the company. They work hard. And today, they’re dealing with extremely hard choices, specifically if they’re remote. I suggest, it’s really coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who lives in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, employment they might feel that they have no choice than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you expect legal obstacles just to the offer itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be truthful, is so unmatched that I think a great deal of us are still attempting to find out what to do with it. I’m unsure if the deal itself may be challengeable. I believe the bigger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not knowledgeable about any authority that exists right now for employment OPM to order firms to give this variety of people administrative leave. So I believe it is really much perhaps setting the phase for difficulties since I feel OPM has actually significantly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our site regards to use and authorizations pages at www.npr.org for more information.

NPR transcripts are developed on a rush deadline by an NPR specialist. This text may not be in its final type and might be upgraded or employment revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may differ. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.