Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, employment HOST: Federal workers have till February 6 to choose whether to voluntarily leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to take leave and be paid up until completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment attorney who represents federal staff members as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s deferred resignation program would really mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact do not consider it so much an offer. I think it’s a request to resign with a vague guarantee that, potentially, you could be kept in administrative leave status for as much as eight months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some people have been utilizing the term buyout to explain what this is because there seems to be the offer of administrative leave for employment up to 8 months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would absolutely not explain it as a buyout. I think that’s an extremely misleading term to utilize in this circumstance. When you think about a buyout, there’s usually some sort of composed contract or a concrete offer to provide an advantage in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for your recommendations, what are you telling them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is workout severe care. There are no warranties included in this email. The only thing I can tell you for particular is that if you change your mind, the company’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some classification of worker who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an attractive offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most cautious because leaving earlier than meant can have serious repercussions, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed press reporters that this is a bargain for people who do not wish to go back to the workplace. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a recommendation to federal employees that they need to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the option to resign, and this administration is very kindly providing to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just – in a method, it breaks my heart that federal staff members are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it’s designed to get folks who work actually hard to resign. I believe it’s trying to pull the wool over a great deal of people’s eyes because there are no warranties. And these are individuals who like their task. They love the objective of the firm. They work hard. And right now, they’re dealing with very tough choices, especially if they’re remote. I indicate, it’s extremely coercive.MARTIN: You say it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who lives in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you prepare for legal obstacles just to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, employment to be sincere, is so extraordinary that I think a lot of us are still attempting to figure out what to do with it. I’m not exactly sure if the deal itself might be challengeable. I believe the larger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not knowledgeable about any authority that exists today for OPM to order firms to provide this number of individuals administrative leave. So I believe it is really much potentially the phase for difficulties since I feel OPM has vastly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for employment signing up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our website regards to usage and consents pages at www.npr.org for more details.

NPR transcripts are produced on a rush due date by an NPR professional. This text might not be in its final kind and may be upgraded or revised in the future. Accuracy and schedule might differ. The reliable record of NPR’s programs is the audio record.