Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal staff members have till February 6 to choose whether to voluntarily leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to depart and be paid up until completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment legal representative who represents federal employees as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for referall.us her interpretation about what OPM’s postponed resignation program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I actually don’t consider it a lot a deal. I think it’s a request to resign with a vague pledge that, possibly, you might be kept in administrative leave status for up to 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been the term buyout to explain what this is because there appears to be the deal of administrative leave for up to eight months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never describe it as a buyout. I think that’s a really misleading term to utilize in this scenario. When you think of a buyout, there’s normally some sort of written contract or a concrete deal to supply an advantage in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for your guidance, what are you telling them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is workout severe care. There are no guarantees contained in this email. The only thing I can inform you for particular is that if you change your mind, the agency’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some classification of employee who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that may this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most cautious due to the fact that leaving earlier than intended can have major consequences, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed reporters that this is a bargain for individuals who don’t wish to return to the workplace. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is an idea to federal workers that they need to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the option to resign, and this administration is very generously providing to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in a method, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, somalibidders.com that it’s developed to get folks who work actually difficult to resign. I think it’s attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of individuals’s eyes since there are no guarantees. And these are people who enjoy their job. They like the objective of the company. They strive. And today, they’re dealing with really difficult choices, especially if they’re remote. I suggest, it’s really coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who lives in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no choice than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you expect legal challenges just to the offer itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be sincere, is so unmatched that I think a lot of us are still trying to determine what to do with it. I’m not exactly sure if the deal itself may be challengeable. I believe the larger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not conscious of any authority that exists right now for OPM to purchase firms to offer this number of individuals administrative leave. So I believe it is quite potentially setting the stage for obstacles due to the fact that I feel OPM has greatly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment legal representative with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our site terms of usage and approvals pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR specialist. This text may not remain in its last form and might be updated or modified in the future. Accuracy and schedule might differ. The authoritative record of NPR’s programs is the audio record.