Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal workers have up until February 6 to decide whether to willingly leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be permitted to depart and be paid until completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment attorney who represents federal workers as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM’s deferred resignation program would really mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I actually do not consider it a lot a deal. I think it’s a demand to resign with an unclear guarantee that, possibly, you might be kept in administrative leave status for approximately eight months – but no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have been utilizing the term buyout to explain what this is since there seems to be the deal of administrative leave for approximately 8 months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never explain it as a buyout. I think that’s a really misleading term to use in this scenario. When you consider a buyout, there’s generally some sort of composed agreement or a concrete deal to offer a benefit in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for your suggestions, what are you telling them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is exercise severe care. There are no assurances consisted of in this e-mail. The only thing I can tell you for particular is that if you alter your mind, the company’s probably not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: employment Exists some classification of worker who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most mindful since leaving earlier than intended can have major repercussions, employment possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me just play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed press reporters that this is a great deal for individuals who do not wish to go back to the workplace. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is an idea to federal workers that they have to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the alternative to resign, employment and employment this is extremely generously providing to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just – in such a way, it breaks my heart that federal staff members are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it’s designed to get folks who work truly hard to resign. I believe it’s trying to pull the wool over a great deal of people’s eyes because there are no warranties. And these are people who love their job. They love the mission of the firm. They strive. And today, they’re facing extremely tough options, specifically if they’re remote. I suggest, it’s extremely coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re somebody who lives in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal challenges just to the offer itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be sincere, is so unprecedented that I think a lot of us are still trying to figure out what to do with it. I’m unsure if the offer itself may be challengeable. I think the larger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not knowledgeable about any authority that exists today for OPM to order companies to provide this variety of people administrative leave. So I think it is quite possibly setting the phase for challenges due to the fact that I feel OPM has actually greatly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work legal representative with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, employment D.C. Thank you a lot for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for employment having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights scheduled. Visit our site terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further info.

NPR transcripts are developed on a rush deadline by an NPR professional. This text might not be in its last kind and may be upgraded or modified in the future. Accuracy and availability might vary. The reliable record of NPR’s programs is the audio record.